New Hampshire bill would ban biometrics in ID cards

Acting out of concerns for residents' privacy, the New Hampshire Legislature is considering a bill that would ban the use of biometrics data in identification cards. But at least two trade groups oppose the legislation, saying biometrics technology has a number of security benefits, namely around ID management. The bill would prohibit biometrics data, including fingerprints, retinal scans and DNA, from being used in state or privately issued ID cards, except for employee ID cards. In addition, it would ban the use of ID devices or systems that require the collection or retention of an individual's biometric data. Under the bill, biometric data would also include palm prints, facial feature patterns, handwritten signature characteristics, voice data, iris recognition, keystroke dynamics and hand characteristics.

http://www.scmagazineus.com/new-hampshire-bill-would-ban-biometrics-in-id-cards/article/163509/

Denying an entire technology, even a disruptive one, seems a little draconian. I agree that any biometric implementation should have privacy concerns woven in from the start. Perhaps the legislation should focus on assuring protection, rather than prohibiting technology. I am sure that many of the residence of New Hampshire would want a new Passport (with biometric enabled microchip) or perhaps those who have trouble remembering their bank PINS could use an alternative (biometric).